Cars
(A) Better Roads Magazine (Publishers Personal Car)
Installed stabilizer on my 1990 automobile
with 40,000 miles with the following immediate results
|
|
HC
|
CO
|
CO2
|
O2
|
Miles/Gal
|
|
Hwy
|
City
|
|
Before
|
248
|
1.33
|
10.1
|
5.52
|
16
|
14/15
|
|
After
|
58
|
0.00
|
11.4
|
5.10
|
22
|
15/16
|
|
%
|
-77%
|
-100%
|
+13%
|
-8%
|
+38%
|
+7%
|
(B) Company Car (Insurance
Company VP - LI, NY)
1998
Cadillac Seville (SLS - V8 Engine), Mileage 109,000 +...
Switched from Premium Grade fuel to now Regular Grade fuel at Octane 87... (an
additional savings)
|
|
Baseline
|
2000 RPM
|
|
|
Jan 4, 2006 @ 4:53 pm
|
|
|
2000 RPM
|
|
idle
|
Diff
|
% % %
|
Readings
|
|
|
|
|
(before)
|
July 2005
|
(after)
|
Nov 2005
|
|
895 RPM
|
Diff
|
% % %
|
|
HC
|
356
|
|
168
|
-188
|
-52.8%
|
17
|
339
|
-95.2%
|
|
CO2
|
13.8
|
(burn
in
process)
|
14.3
|
0.5
|
3.6%
|
14.6
|
-0.8
|
5.8%
|
|
NO ppm
|
67
|
|
50
|
-17
|
-25.4%
|
0
|
67
|
-100.0%
|
|
CO %
|
0.55
|
|
0.14
|
-0.41
|
-74.5%
|
0.01
|
0.54
|
-98.2%
|
|
O2 %
|
1.4
|
|
0.87
|
-0.53
|
-37.9%
|
0.4
|
1
|
-71.4%
|
First test:
* After installation, filled tank with "regular" gas versus previous
usage of HIGH TEST gas only... mechanic took vehicle for test drive and noticed
pick up was quicker and "not" any pinging from going from high test
gas to regular gas, so additional savings from Premimum to Regular grade
immediately...
Second test:
* Mechanic stated the emissions reading now is that of a new car and not one
with 100,000 + miles.
(C) SEE ATTACHED NJ
Inspection report (July 25, 2008)
NJ
Report states - reductions of: NOx @ 89.10%
HC
@ 99.20%
CO
@ 99%
Bus
(A) School System (East Chicago School System)
Installed on mini school bus and regular
school bus for school system using Bacharach 450 emissions testing machine.
Results showed significant reduction in emissions. Regular bus uses bio-diesel
fuel (costing more than regular diesel), which can only be used seasonally
because of temperature/thickness of fuel during colder weather.
School Bus = Aug 21, 2003
94 Degree F Temp.
|
|
BEFORE/ppm
|
AFTER/ppm
|
REDUCTION
|
|
CO =
|
11,933
|
23
|
-99.81%
|
|
HC =
|
.36%
|
.05%
|
-86%
|
|
SO2 =
|
9
|
1
|
-89%
|
|
NOX =
|
40
|
0
|
-100%
|
Locomotive
(A) Locomotive
(USA) Nov/1999 (Georgia Chattahoocia Indl. RailRoad)
Notes:
* Please note that the stack temperature will fluctuate during the "burn
in process" to remove pre-existing carbon/scale buildups... once this
process is complete, the stack temperature will decrease...
* Fuel consumption was not an issue as emissions/pollution was the main
objective.
* Averaged fuel savings 20%
|
|
Before
Jul 22/99
|
Nov 15/99
"After"
|
Diff
|
Savings %
|
|
Stack Temp/Degrees
|
183
|
192
|
9
|
4.92%
|
|
% O / PPM
|
19.50%
|
20.80%
|
0.013
|
6.67%
|
|
CO / PPM
|
58
|
2
|
-56
|
-96.55%
|
|
NOX / PPM
|
110
|
16
|
-94
|
-85.45%
|
|
% O2
|
41.9
|
0.1
|
-41.8
|
-99.76%
|
|
Time
|
10:50 am
|
2:50 pm
|
= = =
|
= = =
|
Aircraft
(A) (FAA & Purdue Univ. Aeronautical
School)
(too many charts to post, please review aircraft section)
Buildings
(A) Boilers - (Verizon)
Weil Mclean rated @65 HP. (Emissions Results)
|
Boiler # 1
|
Temp
|
O2
|
Excess Air
|
CO2
|
CO
|
Combustion
Efficiency
|
|
Before (Nov 15/95)
|
518
|
14.95
|
215
|
12.85
|
22
|
61.20%
|
|
After (June 5/96)
|
426
|
3.9
|
22
|
4.8
|
8
|
85.40%
|
|
%
|
---
|
-74%
|
-90%
|
-63%
|
-64%
|
40%
|
|
Boiler # 2
|
Temp
|
O2
|
Excess Air
|
CO2
|
CO
|
Combustion
Efficiency
|
|
Before (Nov 15/95)
|
554
|
15
|
228
|
7.1
|
341
|
60%
|
|
After (June 5/96)
|
523
|
11.5
|
113.2
|
4.6
|
32
|
73%
|
|
%
|
---
|
-23%
|
-50%
|
-35%
|
-91%
|
22%
|
Average
Fuel Savings: 31%
|
Pre-Stabilizer
|
Post-Stabilizer
|
|
Degree Days
1995
|
Gals
used
|
K-Factor
|
|
845
|
3,057
|
.2764147
|
|
953
|
3,568
|
.2670964
|
|
1,798
|
6,625
|
.2713962
|
|
Note: 3.684 Gals/per
degree day
|
|
|
Degree Days
1996
|
Gals
used
|
K-Factor
|
|
1,091
|
2,451
|
.4451244
|
|
986
|
2,823
|
.3492738
|
|
2,077
|
5,274
|
.3938187
|
|
Note: 2.539 Gals/per degree day (31.0% less fuel used per
degree day)
|
|
Notes:
a. Gals would have been used = 7,653 or + 31.1%
b. Degree Days increased by 279 days or + 13.4%
c. Actual Gals used decreased by 1,351 or - 25.6%
d. Gals per Degree Day decreased by -1 or -45.1%
e. Analyses done by Dr Nasr - (Oak Ridge National Labs)
Dyno Test - Beijing Univ.
(Tested for 5 days - 30 hrs. totally)
(our normal testing period is a minimum of 30 days)
July 6, 2015.
"We just finished 3rd day of test. So far, NOx went down about 25%-30%. The test had mixed results up to the 3rd, last Friday. The good news is NOx is over 50% Lower than the Pre-install number, whilst THC is about 10-15 lower. Nonetheless the emissions reduction has been proven, according to the professor, who was actually very impressed."
Feb 6, 2016: "I have recently presented the product to a few engine manufacturers and will keep you posted. In addition, we have many Chinese strategic investors looking to acquire companies and some of them have expressed interest."
